Which approach is NOT a method for maintaining a sustainable pace?

Maintaining a sustainable pace in work or project management is essential for ensuring that teams can consistently produce high-quality results without sacrificing well-being or productivity over time. The other approaches—cadence, capacity, and commitment—are all strategies aimed at achieving balance and ensuring that work can be done at a steady, manageable rate.

Burnout is characterized by physical, emotional, and mental exhaustion, often resulting from prolonged stress and over-exertion. It negatively impacts productivity and overall team morale, making it unsustainable in any work environment. Unlike the other methods that contribute to a healthy work rhythm where teams can thrive, burnout is the outcome of a lack of balance and excessive demands. Therefore, identifying burnout as the method that does not support maintaining a sustainable pace highlights the importance of well-being in any effective work strategy.